Free classified ads | Online Auctions | Our Weeklies | Long distance call | Weblocal |
The Westmount Examiner
Merkado Generique
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Obama and Harper – Very different men

Richard Cléroux by Richard Cléroux
View all articles from Richard Cléroux
Article online since February 21st 2009, 9:15
Read all 25 comments about this article / Comment on this article
Obama and Harper – Very different men
Barack Obama and Stephen Harper
Obama and Harper – Very different men
Poor Harper. He didn’t quite cut the same figure as Barack Obama.
Canadians are used to having prime ministers who can stand up to their American counterparts.

Compare Pierre Trudeau’s brains to what Richard Nixon had. “No contest.”

Brian Mulroney may not have made as many movies as Ronald Reagan but he knew how to make a speech without having to read a script.

Jean Chrétien was a better golfer than Bill Clinton, but Clinton had hidden talents.

The week we saw Harper up against Obama and the difference was obvious from the first moment on. Harper wanted to avoid the crowds and head to his private office. Obama insisted on going back out to wave to the crowds that had gathered.

When they walked together, Obama took big easy strides and appeared confident looking up and down at the marble work in the corridor. Harper appeared fidgety, and waddled along beside him like a duck out of water.

The difference is reflected in the popularity polls. The latest poll shows 82% of Canadians approve of Obama’s handling of the economy, while only 26% of Canadians agree with how Harper is handling things.

The image we still have of Harper on the economy goes back to the leaders’ debate in the last election when Harper sat motionless and silent, a smile plastered on his face, while Gilles Duceppe, Jack Layton and Stéphane Dion hammered Harper on the economy.

Image is everything for Harper. Who else has his own hairdresser, Michelle Muntean, paid out of public funds, who follows him around everywhere making sure every hair on his head is in place for that special ‘helmet-head’ look he wants. Obama wears his hair cut short, so short he doesn’t need a comb, never mind a hairdresser.

Harper is cold and predictable. Everything he does is planned ahead of time, right down to the last detail. He’s the kind of guy who seeing off his 12-year old son, would shake hands with him rather than giving him a hug.

Obama is forever giving his young daughters big hugs and taking them into his arms. He relishes adventure. As his limousine was leaving for the airport, Obama insisted on a quick side-trip to the Byward Market in Ottawa to buy cookies and a snow-globe for his daughters. He ordered a Beaver Tail (pancake deep-fried and rolled in sugar and cinnamon with maple syrup on it.)

When asked if he’d ever had Beaver Tail before, Obama replied no, but added they had something in Chicago that filled the arteries just as easily.

Harper can be forgiven for not having Obama’s charisma. Few politicians in either country have. But being petty and mean-spirited is another matter.

Afraid of being outshone by Governor-General Michaëlle Jean and Liberal Leader Ignatieff, Harper tried his best to prevent their meetings with Obama while he was here.

Unable to block the meetings Harper tried to ban cameras and press coverage, Mme Jean put her foot down and issued her own invitation to the news media to attend her meeting.

Harper did score a few points during the Obama visit. Rather than contradicting Obama during their news conference, Harper quickly re-interpreted Obama’s commitments in Canada’s favour.

When Obama pledged stronger measures against greenhouse gases and dirty oil and coal Harper pretended that he has been in favour of the Kyoto Accord all along.

Those of us who still have memory will remember Harper once called Kyoto “a socialist plot” and his repeated attacks on it during recent years.

Now it seems Harper is all in favour of Obama’s Green Shift – it takes skill to switch like that—and Harper is even ready to attend the post-Kyoto summit in Copenhagen in 2011.

Obama just looked at Harper and smiled. Not so stupid this fellow, Obama must have thought.

Two really different guys.

Your comments

Full name:
(required)


Email address:


Your comments :
(required)


Please retype the word displayed below Can't read the word?

Please retype the word displayed below:


Neil Davy

Comment online since February 24th 2009
There is not one thing that you wrote about in this mean-spirited article that I would agree with.
NeilD

TangoJuliette

Comment online since February 24th 2009
TangoJuliette Says:
February 24th, 2009 at 7:42 pm
To :

Cc: Cleroux

This Cleroux (Westmount Examiner) presents as a petty, petulant, dick-headed pissant, incapable of mustering anything which might closely resemble serious and analytical journalism.

I know journalists. This mental midget IS NOT a journalist. More of a partisan hack. A cheerless Librano cheerleader, with no reason for cheering.

Methinks he more closely resembles a pom-pom-less cheerleader, a sycophant in grave and serious need of a whacking, uh, no, no . . . lemme rephrase that . . . in serious need of a *waxing.*

isn’t Westmount the Spaceman’s riding, or is it good old what’s her name? marlene something or other??

’nuff said.

tj

t.e.&.o.e.

Reba West

Comment online since February 24th 2009
Richard Cléroux,

Are you kidding me and Canadians, that you actually call yourself an educated journalist?

It would appear gossip journalism, has become the only drivel, in both print and broadcast media.

Fortunately, I refuse to support either and with any luck, we may have less of this calibre to deal with soon.

Yes,yes, I read your pathetic gossip but only as far as it took to gag and then comment.

It will be intriguing to watch you lathering media types, justify all that you are doing and did, in say, 3 years?

Grow up and leave the groupie syndrome to the 14 year olds.

JustAnotherWeterner

Comment online since February 24th 2009
Wouldn't you love it if the Mighty "O" was this articulate & diplomatic?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1043703424

Mervin Hollingsworth

Comment online since February 23rd 2009
Mr.Cleroux in his appearances on CPAC has never shown himself to be a supporter of our Prime Minister and his government. So it is no wonder his column is at odds with most pundits and the media when comparing Harper and Obama. Harper has had a tough 3 years governing in a minority parliament and certainly has had the strains of the global meltdown longer to bear than Obama. Harper has a track record and Obama has none. Physically they have different builds. Since when have media people reduced their commentaries to how leaders are built and look when walking. A scandalous column by a Liberal lackey. Shame on you Mr. Cleroux

Agent Smith

Comment online since February 23rd 2009
Also - congratulations on getting the most comments you're ever going to get.

Agent Smith

Comment online since February 23rd 2009
I stopped reading the artical after the first paragraph or so...you have a real hard on for PMSH don't you? If your going to put him down at least try not to be so ham fisted, people then might at least be amused by your style.

Wow

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
you're a harper hater if I ever saw one.

Comparing two politicians based on how they hug their kids, walk, comb their hair and order food is hardly fair.

You speak of petty acts, well look at what you just wrote.

To say that everything Harper says is calculated may be true, but it is also true of all modern politics. Obama's election campaign was a product of pure science. The repetition of key words, all his speeches were practically mathematical. Political scientists have been writing about this for a while now. He delivers them very well.

Finally, the press have been doing nothing but critisize Harper and saying he should be more like Obama... He shows an interest in the Green Shift and you shoot him down for it.

I'm not making this argument to pick sides, I have my own problems with Harper. But in this case, it is you who is petty.

Average Joe

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Hey buddy you actually get paid to write this crap? Watching PM Harper on CNN with Wolf trying to trip him up...he did a tremendous job got his points across clearly.You sir are a complete fool,enough said!.

Richard

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
another tough day in lefty-land, eh?

it's great to finally have a PM we can be proud of, and who is respected on the world stage.

if only the NDP and LPC could find somebody half as good. It's gotta be killing you.

JustAnotherWesterner

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Oh, by the way. Did somebody say the writer of this article is a journalist? I don't believe it.

JustAnotherWesterner

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Your attempts to compare a populist, Hollywood-style, adulated, messianistic, narccisist with a Political Leader. Your own words speak volumes.
"Brian Mulroney may not have made as many movies as Ronald Reagan but he knew how to make a speech without having to read a script."
Compare the CNN/Harper interview with CBC/Obama. Who needs the teleprompter? O' slowly states "Yes Canada has a better banking system & we did make some mistakes" and continues to make the same mistakes.
"Jean Chrétien was a better golfer than Bill Clinton, but Clinton had hidden talents.
These are certainly talents mandatory in a good PM.
On the one hand you imply PMSH is vain with his own hairdresser et al & in the next "Harper wanted to avoid the crowds and head to his private office" Well, which is it? A vainglorious attention seeker or a serious business politician?
God, you are an idiot. Which is it " Everything he does is planned ahead of time, right down to the last detail." or "Now it seems Harper is all in favour of Obama’s Green Shift – it takes skill to switch like that"
" Rather than contradicting Obama during their news conference, Harper quickly re-interpreted Obama’s commitments in Canada’s favour." Again I refer you to the two preliminary interviews. Anybody not smitten by unconditional, ingratiating adulation of Obama can see the difference between an articulated, informed and prepared strategist and an egotist whose main concern is looking good for his fawning acolytes.
Also your statistics are plain false.

Tim Hanson

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
It wouldn't have entered Harper's head to go and acknowledge mere members of the public. Obama is both people and media savvy. Harper is neither. He's probably happier hanging out with his cats or plotting to screw someone over.

In any event, you can hear the knives being sharpened across the country for Harper. He has betrayed every conservative tenet in the past few weeks and single-handedly reignited the sovereignist movement with his vitriol.

Donna Hanson

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Actually - if you look at Harper's face, he seems to be gazing into Obama's mouth. A bit of photoshopping??

Donna Hanson

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Funny - since we are into comparing appearances - How come Obama looks taller when in real life, he is actually shorter than Harper

Obama - 6.1
Harper - 6.2

This wouldn't be a bit of "editing" now would it?

Donna Hanson

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
"Obama insisted on going back out to wave to the crowds that had gathered. "

You are wrong - if you watch the tape, you clearly see Harper moving Obama back to wave to the crowd.

But that would mean you would have to say something good about Harper, wouldn't it.

What a shoddy piece of journalism.

Gabby in QC

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
What a silly trite column. I'm not surprised, though, since I've heard you spout the same kind of inane comments passing as 'analysis' on CPAC's Revue Politique.

Have you considered writing for The Globe? No, not The Globe and Mail. This Globe: http://www.globemagazine.com/

Albertaclipper

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
You have got to be kidding. You lefties are champs at revisionism and turning "what is" into "what you would like".

Anne Streeter

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Actually I'm with you Mr. Cleroux. Perhaps it is unfair to compare two such very different personalities but in so doing I think you have done a good job. As to who decided to turn and wave to the crowd before entering the building it was clearly and obviously Mr. Obama. The "climate change is a socialist plot" quote is accurate and stunning but even more stunning is Mr. Harper leveling the blame for Canada's foot dragging on Mr. Bush!

Jim Morrell

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Outstanding. Your article is a first class take on Harper. The fact that the GG outshined Harper is no surprise. His office has done everything to limit anyone with any abilities to distract attention from their boss. The reality is, Stephen Harper is a politician who has been obsessed with political power and control over everyone and everything. He has not actually governed. The disaster HE caused in November is the measure of the man. Harper is no statesman. His time has come and gone. I look forward to a change in Prime Ministers.
Greeting to all the Tory staffers and their comments below.

Betty Porteus

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Typical Liberal bias reporting. My American relatives were most impressed with our Prime Minister from the CNN coverage. Too bad Canadians partisanship can never see one 'good' thing out of a historic meeting. But buying coverage for Ignatieff on Times Square billboard is really 'classy'? Subversion of country comes in many guises. So much for 'co-operative' governing by our leading parties...same old, same old low class garbage.

Jenny Smithson

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
I'm stunned at the hatefulness of this article. The columnist is actually comparing hairstyles? What ignorance.

Pardon Me!

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
What an ugly hate-filled article! Bile-producing, really!



Marsha May

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
Another day , another irrelevant liberal columnist spews out some more garbage .

bert

Comment online since February 22nd 2009
I agree Richard is a typical puke MSM,who cannot and will not ever say a good thing about PM Harper.It just shows how small these MSM idiots are and how far ahead in intelligence that our PM is. Well done PM Harper.

Related Newspapers






Slow Cooker Pulled Pork Tacos

Recipe of the day

Slow Cooker Pulled Pork Tacos

Start the ingredients in the slow cooker in the morning so dinner simmers during the day. With garnishes set out on the table, everyone can... [+] More

Links