Classified ads | Bids | Our Weeklies | Long distance call
Transcontinental
Banner ANGRIGNON regular English
The Westmount Examiner
Entete Welcome Westmount
Send this text to a friend Print this article Comment on this article

Affiliation/Patriotes showdown controversy continues

Toula Foscolos by Toula Foscolos
View all articles from Toula Foscolos
Article online since March 18th 2008, 14:49
Read all 3 comments about this article / Comment on this article
Affiliation/Patriotes showdown controversy continues
Having written a column for years, I've grown accustomed to the bravos and the beratements and take both with a grain of salt. Still… it never fails to amaze me when a specific topic manages to create a larger than life reaction.
My March 5th column, "Sunday Showdown between Affiliation Quebec and Jeunes Patriotes", generated numerous angry emails from some English readers, including Affiliation Quebec leader, Allen Nutik.

I can assure you that in my years as a columnist, I've received just as many angry letters from French readers, because choosing to see the bigger picture in turn brands you as "too afraid and too stupid" by Affiliation Quebec and a "maudite anglophone" by hardline separatists.

There are many of you out there who feel your rights have completely been trampled on. While I have no reason to doubt that your frustration is real, I don't feel that way. I've never felt like I was a 'second class citizen', never failed to get a job, never been to a hospital where a doctor was unable to speak to me in English. Readers can tell me otherwise, but that's my reality and I can't invent a different one to suit someone's purposes.

That being said, it would be foolish of me to assume that my personal experience negates the experiences of so many anglophones in Quebec. There are ridiculous and petty things that take place in this province (on both sides of the linguistic fence) that sometimes leave me scratching my head or mad as hell, but since I also follow the French media closely, I know the extreme cases perplex moderate francophones as well.

The problem with living in a linguistic ghetto (no matter the language) is that it creates a vacuum where one side --one solitude-- exists without any understanding, comprehension, respect and empathy for the other.

Being an allophone and someone who has spent a good chunk of my life abroad, I sometimes feel removed from the French-English linguistic debate taking place ad nauseum here. As a result, my perspective is one of detached objectivity, which often doesn't lend itself to two-page tub-thumping diatribes about the loss of English rights or the imminent danger the French language is in. I'm not saying my view is more 'evolved'; I'm saying it's less inclined to attach itself to knee-jerk reactions to the politics of division. Paradoxically, and while Affiliation Quebec and the Jeunes Patriotes would have me believe otherwise, nowhere in Canada do I feel more at home than right here in Quebec.

Buddhism states that "we see as we are". If you live your life with a linguistic chip on your shoulder, than you seek out everything that will validate your belief. If you're a francophone who believes that the English are the enemy, than everything you see, hear and read will be perceived as such. If you're an anglophone who feels that your rights have being trampled on, that's all you see.

Personally, I think we should all get with the times. The sentiments and feelings of alienation expressed in Pierre Vallière's “Nègre blanc d’Amérique” have no reason to resonate or apply to today’s francophones, and if they do, we should ask why. Affiliation Quebec certainly has a right to express itself in a democratic society, but inviting Galganov (a man francophones positively have an allergic reaction to) to speak on anglophones' behalf, is a silly move, serving only to provoke.

Choosing to knowingly perpetuate the politics of discord and division is what groups like Affiliation Quebec, the Jeunes Patriotes, the FLQ, Canadians against Enforced Bilingualism and English Language Advocates (the last two operating out of Ottawa) to name a few, are all about and I would rather focus on moderation than spend my time chasing my tail and engaging in the same old tired debates.

Ultimately, when I write an editorial, I don't expect that everyone’s going to agree with me. But that’s not really the point of an opinion column, is it? To paraphrase New York Times columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner, Anna Quindlen, “The point is not to make the readers think like me. It is to make them think”.

That’s exactly what a column should aim to do. Sometimes it can solidify your beliefs, but mostly, it should make you call into question some of them. So it doesn't matter if you don't agree with everything I say. I’m not here to “make nice”; I’m here to make you think. Apparently, I'm also here to make you angry.

Your comments

I understand.

Dave Cameron
Article online since March 26th 2008
I can understand you taking a neutral position on the
language situation in Quebec. My point of view is this. When the government of Quebec and other provinces do not give linguistic equaulity to everyone in that one province. i.e Quebec. It disturbs me. There will always be discrimination between cultures. When any government in power do not give equality to all people, you will have anger. I feel that the Quebec language laws had good intentions in the beginning. It would seem though that now, it unintentionally breeds hatred for angloplones and everything not french. Not everyone can be bilingual in this country called Canada. We must give equality to all langauges in Canada and that includes Quebec.


Reconciliation

Valorie Hall
Article online since March 25th 2008
Dear Toula Foscolos,

I have lived in Montreal for a while now and have had the privilege and honor to get to know, up close and personal, English and French Quebecers. The objection I have with your article is that you just dismiss these people you call “alienation groups” without examining who they really are. If you had taken the time to get to the heart of these people, you would know that most of them only want to feel accepted and respected. That respect and acceptance can only come about through reconciliation. The French and English must admit the pain and suffering they have inflicted on each other and ask for forgiveness. After the wounds of the past have been healed through the reconciliation process, I believe the language issue will seize to exist.

I have faith that the French and English will reconcile because their forefathers laid a firm foundation based on democratic principles that cannot be easily ignored after so many generations.




The Language Issue "Conspiracy"

Gordon Berringer
Article online since March 21st 2008
Dear Ms. Foscolos

I have been reading with great interest to your Affiliation/Patriotes columns and I would like to add my two cents to all the crazy talk over this “great” debate.

The recent language brouhaha has nothing to do with cultural insecurity vs. language rights but is a ploy to plunge Quebec and Canada into a police state. The Bouchard - Taylor commission was a first step by the Quebec Liberals to ramp up anxiety among Quebec society. Meanwhile, the ADQ and Conservatives are secretly funding militant groups on both sides of the language divide to deepen the gulf between Anglophones and Francophones. This of course will lead to some strategic confrontations that will ultimately result in violence and our governments will have “no choice” but to intervene. They will give the police enhanced powers and label language and resistance groups as terrorist organizations thus making government dissent illegal. Allen Nutik (AQ) and Mario Beaulieu (MMF) are both actually part of the secret Illuminati that will bring the fascist New World Order into our corner of the globe.

Of course I am joking but the point is that the whole language debate has become just as ludicrous as my conspiracy theory is and we need to just get on with our lives. Unfortunately it will not go away so my advice to both Mr. Nutik and M. Beaulieu is this: We live in a post 9/11 world where governments are looking for any convenient excuse to increase security at the expense of our civil liberties. So cool it with the confrontational and divisive rhetoric and let us sit down to have a reasonable and civil debate about Quebec’s future.


Columnist

Related Newspapers